Legal Opinion

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 2, 1963No. Civ. C 63-55PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.

The Rutland Railroad sought a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the Interstate Commerce Commission allowing it to totally abandon its railroad and the operations thereon. In the proceedings before the Interstate Commerce Commission, numerous parties were represented and heard, including the Rutland Railroad, the Railway Labor Executives’ Association, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, the State of Vermont, the City of Rutland, the Emergency Committee to Save the Rutland Railway, and various shippers.

The Interstate Commerce Commission…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Riss & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Riss & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Allied Van Lines Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
  3. Frozen Foods Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
  4. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API