Legal Opinion

Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 7, 1969No. 68 C 239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

DOOLING, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s action is brought to enjoin and annul 1967 Orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission [28 U.S.C. § 1336 (a), (c)] which denied plaintiff the right to abandon certain track which it operated in Block 2349 of its Kent Avenue terminal on the East River waterfront in the Williamsburgh section of Brooklyn [28 U.S.C. §§ 2284, 2321-2325; 49 U.S.C. § 17(9)]. It is concluded that the relief sought must be denied.

Plaintiff has operated since 1940 as a common carrier subject to the Interstate Commerce Act. Plaintiff picks up freight cars on car…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hudson C. Millar, Jr., and James Jerdan Bullard v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Buckner Trucking, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1973
  3. Matter of New York, Susquehanna & Western R. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API