Legal Opinion
Federal Power Commission v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 28, 1955No. 45PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton
The principal question before us is whether, on a petition to review a natural gas rate reduction order of the Federal Power Commission, a Court of Appeals may consider, sua sponte, an objection which has not been urged before the Commission in the application for rehearing prescribed by § 19 of the Natural Gas Act. Alterna tively, a question also is raised whether, in such a rate proceeding, a Court of Appeals may invalidate, sua sponte, an existing order of the Commission, which prohibits the inclusion of certain operating expenses of the natural gas company in its cost of service, where…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rezi P. Forshey, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Village of Barrington v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- In the Matter of David A. DAVIDSON, Debtor. Nancy Y. DAVIDSON, Appellant, v. David A. DAVIDSON, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.