Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentHanson, Justice
Although I concur with the majority’s conclusions that a general business corpo*525ration may conduct the practices of physical therapy and massage therapy, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that a general business corporation may not conduct the practice of chiropractic. I would conclude that the regulation of the ownership of a chiropractic practice is not within the inherent power of the court, but is a matter for the legislature, which has not prohibited a general business corporation from conducting such a practice. Further, I would conclude that the so called “corporate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nieting v. BlondellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- In Re Disbarment of George H. OtternessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- American Medical Assn. v. FTCSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Williams v. MackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Granger v. AdsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.