Legal Opinion · Dissent

Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 15, 2005No. A04-485, A04-486, A04-487, A04-488, A04-489Published

1DissentHanson, Justice

Although I concur with the majority’s conclusions that a general business corpo*525ration may conduct the practices of physical therapy and massage therapy, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that a general business corporation may not conduct the practice of chiropractic. I would conclude that the regulation of the ownership of a chiropractic practice is not within the inherent power of the court, but is a matter for the legislature, which has not prohibited a general business corporation from conducting such a practice. Further, I would conclude that the so called “corporate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nieting v. BlondellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. In Re Disbarment of George H. OtternessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. American Medical Assn. v. FTCSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Williams v. MackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Granger v. AdsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API