Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 21, 1983No. 1 CA-CR 6077PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction of DWI in the Phoenix city court which was affirmed on appeal to the superior court. This appeal is permitted by A.R.S. § 22-375 because the appellant questions the constitutionality of the DWI statute A.R.S. § 28-692(A). And see State v. Renteria, 126 Ariz. 591, 617 P.2d 543 (App.1979).

The appellant’s attack on the constitutionality of the statute is two-fold:

1) it is vague where no chemical test has been obtained, and

2) it does not provide for any culpable mental state and thus violates due process.

We disagree with both propositions…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. State v. HaroldArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Hasten v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Morgan v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. State v. ZaragozaArizona Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API