Derwinski v. Eureka Tire Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appeal is taken by defendant, Eureka Tire Company, from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board denying apportionment between Eureka Tire Company and Hosking Tire Company of an award of benefits to plaintiff. Eureka claims that the plaintiff’s back injury is the result of degenerative disk syndrome, which, in turn, spanned the course of plaintiff’s employment at both Eureka and Hosking. From this, Eureka maintains that degenerative disk syndrome is a disease within the contemplation of the apportionment statute 1 so as to entitle it to contribution from Hosking.
There is no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bingham v. American Screw Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Skowronski v. Ajax Forging & Casting Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by9 opinions
- Derwinski v. EUREKA TIRE COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. PettwayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hughes v. Lakey Foundry Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Todd v. TEXTRON, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Downs v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.