Legal Opinion

State v. Watson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2019No. 20180294; 20180295; 20180296PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

*147[¶1] James Watson appeals after a jury found he was guilty of continuous sexual abuse of a child in Golden Valley County, he conditionally pled guilty to sexual assault in Hettinger County, and he conditionally pled guilty to continuous sexual abuse of a child in Stark County. Watson argues the district court erred by granting continuances in all three cases and violated his statutory speedy trial rights. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion by granting the State's motions for continuances in the Hettinger and Stark County cases. But Watson's statutory speedy…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. RipleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. WunderlichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Watson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. MondragonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Watson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. SolomonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API