Legal Opinion

Langley v. Deshazer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1956No. 8443PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Justice.

This is an action to have a private driveway declared a private nuisance and to have it abated so as to allow water backed up on plaintiffs’ (respondents’) lands from defendants’ (appellants’) pumping pond to drain away. Plaintiffs asked damages in the sum of $3,000. Defendants maintain that they have acquired an easement by prescriptive right to maintain the private driveway to use as a levee to raise the water level for pumping purposes.

The parties to this action are adjoining landowners. The lands of the defendants lie westerly from those of the plaintiffs, and are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Boise Valley Construction Co. v. KroegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Fogelstrom v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Driesbach v. LynchIdaho Supreme Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Mikol v. VlahopoulosArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Independent School District v. C. B. Lauch Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. CIT Corporation v. HessIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API