Mikol v. Vlahopoulos
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
Appellant, Michael Mikol, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was the owner and developer of a subdivision in the Payson area known as Kohl’s Tonto Creek Ranch. He sold a lot to appellees, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, for their use as a summer homesite. This lot had not been marked on the formal plat, but lay directly above one of the most northern marked lots. It measured 120 feet from north to south, and 60 feet from east to west, with the western boundary along Tonto Creek and the eastern boundary along a narrow road running south through the subdivision.
Defenda…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hartshorn v. . ChaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Herzog v. GrossoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hanns v. FriedlyOregon Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Weld County Bd. of County Com'rs v. SlovekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Jowdy v. GuerinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Mel Foster Co. Properties v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Santa Fe Partnership v. ARCO Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.