Legal Opinion
CIT Corporation v. Hess
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 22, 1964No. 9428PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
Plaintiff (respondent) brought this action to recover from defendant (appellant) the balance alleged due upon an “Equipment Lease” contract, dated September 23, 1959, and assigned to plaintiff September 29, 1959. The material terms of the lease were as follows:
“Lessor hereby leases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby hires and takes from Lessor the following-described personal property (hereinafter, with all replacement parts, additions, repairs and accessories incorporated therein and/or affixed thereto, referred to as “equipment”): * * *
1 — NEW MODEL 38-B BUCYRUS-ERIE SHOVEL —…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thomson v. MarksIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Wackerli v. MartindaleIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Independent Gas & Oil Co. v. T. B. Smith Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Motor Contract Company v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Gillingham v. StadlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Mikesell v. Newworld Development Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- Cooke v. IversonIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Cook v. Western Field Seeds, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.