Densmore v. Tomer
Nebraska Supreme Court
Rehearing of case reported 11 Neb., 118. cited: Ransom v. Solivíela, 13 Neb., 73. Orowell v. Ploracele, 12 Neb., 625. Sackett Instructions, 168. Bump on Fraud, 165. On res adjudieata cited: Wales v. I/yon, 2 Micb., 276. Kelly on question of fraud, cited: Cadbury v. Nolen, 5 Penn., 320. Dewart v. Clement, 48 Penn., 413. Burrows v. Stebbins, 26 Vt., 650. 8haw v. Thompson, 43 N. H., 130. Like v. Morris, 30 Conn., 201. Dexter v. Perkins, 22 111., 143. Vanee v. Boynton, 8 Cal.,…
Read the full summary
Rehearing of case reported 11 Neb., 118. cited: Ransom v. Solivíela, 13 Neb., 73. Orowell v. Ploracele, 12 Neb., 625. Sackett Instructions, 168. Bump on Fraud, 165. On res adjudieata cited: Wales v. I/yon, 2 Micb., 276. Kelly on question of fraud, cited: Cadbury v. Nolen, 5 Penn., 320. Dewart v. Clement, 48 Penn., 413. Burrows v. Stebbins, 26 Vt., 650. 8haw v. Thompson, 43 N. H., 130. Like v. Morris, 30 Conn., 201. Dexter v. Perkins, 22 111., 143. Vanee v. Boynton, 8 Cal., 554. Van Polt v. Pettier, 10 Cal., 394. Bump’s Fraudulent Conveyances, pp. 131 — 6. Webster v. Peek, 31 Conn., 495.…
1Opinion of the Court
Lake, Ch. J.
The points now urged upon our attention, and tbe argument to support them, are not materially different from those presented at the former hearing. What we then regarded, and still regard, the principal question in the record, was whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the jury in finding that the sale of the goods to the j>laintiff was fraudulent? As slated in our former opinion, Densmore v. Tomer, 11 Neb., 118, the burden of showing the sale to have been honest was on the plaintiff, no actual visible change of possession of the goods having attended it. This burden was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Densmore v. TomerNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Mader v. MettenbrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Falbe v. CavesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Snyder v. DanglerNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Cole v. Merchants Nat. BankLucas Circuit Court · 1907