Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. Combe

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 24, 1990No. 880353-CAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partOrme, Judge

B-H apparently lacked actual notice at least of the extent of the waterline easement until well after the purchase agreement was entered into. Nonetheless, the easement appeared of record and thus B-H “is properly charged with constructive notice” of the easement. Callister v. Millstream Assocs., Inc., 738 P.2d 662, 663 n. 3 (Utah Ct.App.1987); Utah Code Ann. § 57-3-2(1) (1990).

In Callister, which concerned a similar contractual provision to the effect that title would be conveyed free of all liens and encumbrances, with no provision made to exempt easements of record or particular classes of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bergstrom v. MooreUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Callister v. Millstream Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API