Legal Opinion

Marlowe Investment Corporation v. Radmall

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1971No. 12280PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff, Marlowe Investment Corporation, sued to recover payments allegedly accrued on a uniform real estate contract by which the defendants purchased real property upon which there is a fruit stand in Pleasant Grove, Utah. Upon a plenary-trial of the issues, the District Court made findings and gave judgment in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

The contract was entered into on April 20, 1963, by which the defendants agreed to purchase the property from Joseph E. and Isabella Bird for the sum of $7800, $500 down and $75 per month. The vendors later assigned the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mawhinney v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Wasatch Oil Refining Co. v. Wade, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Woodard v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Tremonton Inv. Co. v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Leavitt v. BlohmUtah Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beckstrom v. BeckstromUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Williamson v. WanlassUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Fisher v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bergstrom v. MooreUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Corporation Nine v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API