Ritter v. WESTERN ELEC. CO., INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Promulgation of a rule of law often requires subsequent refinement and explication as courts apply it to new and unanticipated circumstances. The process does not end with the original articulation, “for the many and varying facts to which it will be applied cannot be foreseen”. 1 In the case at bar circumstances which will justify a union member’s failure to exhaust internal union remedies prior to institution of legal proceedings require more explicit description. Plaintiff alleges that defendants International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fleming v. MacK Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Wolf v. National Shopmen Pension FundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Anderson v. Alpha Portland Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1982
- Easton Area Joint Sewer Authority v. Bushkill-Lower Lehigh Joint Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Peterson v. Lehigh Valley District CouncilDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.