Legal Opinion

Scholes v. Stone, McGuire and Benjamin

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 25, 1992No. 90 C 7201PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

In this case, defendants Stone, McGuire & Benjamin (“SMB”), Howard L. Stone (“Stone”), a partner of SMB, Michael L. Siegel (“Siegel”), a non-equity partner of SMB, Rosenthal & Schanfield, P.C. (“R & S”), William P. Rosenthal (“Rosenthal”), a senior shareholder of R & S, and Leslie J. Weiss (“Weiss”), an attorney employed by R & S have filed separate motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint. 1 In addition, SMB filed a separate motion for sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure against Gary L. Prior (“Pri- or”) and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pucci v. LitwinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  2. Scholes v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. S & K CHEVROLETDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1994
  4. Scholes v. Stone, McGuire & BenjaminDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  5. Parrott v. Commissioner SSADistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API