Legal Opinion

Scholes v. Moore

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 12, 1993No. 90 C 6615PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESLA, District Judge.

This action is brought by Steven S. Scholes (“Scholes”), not individually but solely as Receiver for D & S Trading Group, Ltd. (“D & S”), Analytic Trading Systems, Inc. (“AT Systems”) and Analytic Trading Service, Inc. (“AT Service”), and by John and Pamela LaVinka (the “LaVinkas”), individually and on behalf of a putative class of investors in D & S, AT Systems, and AT Service, against defendant Michael Moore (“Moore”). Presently before the court is the LaVinkas’ Motion for Class Certification.

This action arises out of certain fraudulent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Rosario v. LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Clarence C. Trotter v. Paul J. Klincar, Individually and as Acting Chairman of the Prison Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Secretary of Labor v. FitzsimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  2. Arenson v. Whitehall Convalescent & Nursing Home, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  3. Peterson v. H & R Block Tax Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  4. Anderson v. CornejoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  5. In re Managed Care LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API