Legal Opinion

In Re Bendet

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1998No. 97-BG-656PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes to us from the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) as a reciprocal discipline case from the Supreme Court of New Jersey. The New Jersey court permanently disbarred respondent, with his consent, after he was adjudicated guilty of theft by deception. Permanent disbarment exceeds the range of disciplinary sanctions which this court may impose upon this respondent. In re McBride, 602 A.2d 626, 641 (D.C.1992) (en banc). The Board has, therefore, recommended that respondent be disbarred with the right to apply for reinstatement after five years. No party has filed an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re WilewskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. In re AinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In re LebarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. In re PhillipsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API