Legal Opinion

Davidson v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 8, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1283 (RMU)PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Sever; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendants’ First Motion to Dismiss; Holding in Abeyance the Defendants’ Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Pending the Submission of Additional Evidence By Plaintiffs’ Counsel

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs in this action are the parents of eighty-five disabled students who allegedly prevailed in 158 separate administrative proceedings brought under the Individuals with Disabilities Education and Improvement Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. Through this…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Call of the Wild Movie, LLC v. DOES 1-1,062District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Spaeth v. Michigan State University College of LawDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-5District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Doe v. Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Pinson v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API