Legal Opinion
Momand v. Paramount Publix Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1937No. 1477PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant brought this action at law against appellees to recover treble damages under IS U.S.C.A. § IS, 38 Stat. 731.
The record sets forth a purported motion interposed by appellees to strike certain portions of the amended petition and to require appellant tO' make certain portions thereof more definite and certain and purported rulings by the trial court on such motion. Neither the motion nor the rulings are incorporated in a bill of exceptions.
The appeal is from the following order:
“Now on the 9th day of July, the plaintiff having announced in open court that the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- The Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ewing v. Vernon CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Chicago Great Western R. v. ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Momand v. Universal Film Exchange, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
- Tsibikas v. MorrofNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Champlin Refining Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937