Legal Opinion
McKoy v. Keel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 17, 1933No. 20956PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
The plaintiff in error was the plaintiff below, and the defendants in error were the defendants below. The parties will be designated herein as plaintiff and defendants as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff by his petition sought to recover possession of an undivided one-third interest in and to the E. ½ of the S. E. ¼ of the S. E. Vi of section 27; and the N. Vz of the N. E. V, of the N. E. % and the S. W. V of the N. E. Vi of the N. E. Vi and the E. Vz of the N. W. Vi of the N. E. Vi and the N. E. Vi of the S. W. Vi of the N. E. V and the.N. W. V. of the S. E. V of the Ñ. E. Vi of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Harrison v. Corry PharmacySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Canfield v. JackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- International Land Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Hampton v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- OKLAHOMA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INS. CO. v. TyraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Enosburg Falls Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935