Canfield v. Jack
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action between G. W. Canfield and others and Lolly Jack, by his guardian, John Tiger, and others, involving title to Indian allotment of Susie Crow, deceased. From the judgment, the parties first mentioned bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The land involved in this litigation is in the heart of the Cushing oil field and is of great value. There were originally many parties and many conflicting interests, hut owing to the fact that many of these interests have been settled, we will only burden the reader of this opinion with the facts necessary to determine the issues in this case.
In the month of September, 1899, Susie Crow, an infant, died, and after her death there was allotted to her heirs the lands, consisting of 1@J acres, involved in this suit. On her mothws side there were two full-blood aunts, Mollie Crow, now Mollie…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Sizemore v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Pickering v. LomaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lykins v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Skelton v. DillSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Arnold v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Teuscher v. GraggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Ginner & Miller Publishing Co. v. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Pluto Oil & Gas Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.