Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Corry Pharmacy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1920No. 9621PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield County; J. C. Robberts, Judge, Action by C. W. Harrison against the Corry Pharmacy and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

This was an action instituted by one C. W. Harrison to recover from the Corry Pharmacy and others on a promissory note.

The case is very similar to cause No. 9620, Fred L. Stevens v. Oklahoma Automobile Company et al., this day decided (ante, p. 126), and the cases are briefed on the same theory. The decision, therefore, in cause No. 9620 is decisive of the propositions herein involved.

The cause is therefore reversed, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial. 1

OWEN, C. J., and KANE, JOHNSON, and BAILEY, JJ., concur.

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. Arnold v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  3. Teuscher v. GraggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Brink v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Ginner & Miller Publishing Co. v. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API