Legal Opinion

Al-Dohan v. Kouyoumjian

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin Evans, J.

Defendant moves to vacate an attachment on the grounds that plaintiff failed, within 60 days of obtaining the attachment, to complete commencement of the action by the valid service of a summons. This motion requires the court to examine the underlying purpose of a summons within the context of the revised attachment statute.

This proceeding arises out of a long series of Middle Eastern business dealings between plaintiff, a Saudi Arabian subject and resident, and defendant, a Syrian-born Armenian now residing in California. The nature and scope of their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Dobkin v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Valz v. Sheepshead Bay Bungalow Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Sugar v. Curtis Circulation CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of New York v. Chemical BankNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Graubard Mollen Dannett & Horowitz v. KostantinidesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Al-Dohan v. KouyoumjianNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API