Legal Opinion
Graubard Mollen Dannett & Horowitz v. Kostantinides
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 21, 1989No. 88 Civ. 8054 (KC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONBOY, District Judge:
This action arises out of the failure of the defendants, an individual nondomiciliary and a foreign corporation controlled by him, to pay legal fees for services rendered by the plaintiff law firm, who is appearing pro se.
On September 29, 1988, plaintiff obtained, in Supreme Court, New York County, an ex parte Order of Attachment pursuant to CPLR 6201(1). Plaintiff moved to confirm the attachment on or about October 13, 1988. The defendants then cross-moved to vacate the attachment. On November 14, 1988, before the state court judge had the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Lesportsac, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Itc Entertainment, Limited v. Nelson Film Partners and Frank MenkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Reading & Bates Corp. v. National Iranian Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- General Textile Printing & Processing Corp. v. Expromtorg International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- In Re Amaranth Natural Gas Commodities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Haggiag v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Pollafko, Inc. v. Okulos Comercio Varejista De Produtos Opticos LTDADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022