Legal Opinion
Warner Cable Communications Inc. v. Borough of Schuylkill Haven
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 29, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-0152PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
This diversity action arises out of a dispute between the Borough of Schuylkill Haven (“Schuylkill Haven Borough”) and Warner Cable Communications Inc. (“Warner Cable”) over who will supply cable television services to the residents of Schuylkill Haven Borough. 1 Warner Cable contends that Schuylkill Haven Borough is preparing to build and operate its own cable television company, and that in doing so Schuylkill Haven Borough violates both its exclusive contract with Warner Cable and the Pennsylvania Borough Code. 2 Warner Cable asks this court…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Delaware Valley Toxics Coalition v. Kurz-Hastings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Presbytery of New Jersey of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church v. FlorioDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Lattany v. Four Unknown U.S. MarshalsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Ernst & Young v. Depositors Economic Protection Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1994
- Permanent General Assurance Corp. v. MooreDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.