Legal Opinion

Delaware Valley Toxics Coalition v. Kurz-Hastings, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-5961PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM/ORDER

KATZ, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 1993, upon consideration of Motion of Kurz-Hastings, Inc. for Reconsideration, or in the Alternative, for Certification for Appeal of an Interlocutory Order, Pursuant to Local Rule 20(g), Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of Court Order of December 29, 1992, or for Certification of that Order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), and after hearing the parties at a pretrial conference, it is hereby…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Douris v. SchweikerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Department of Labor & Industry v. HeltzelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. GEICO Corp. v. Autoliv, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API