Legal Opinion

State v. Sauve

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1976No. 3160PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

The defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence for the crime of first degree burglary. This Court took jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.

The defendant, on appeal, contends that the trial court committed reversible error in two respects, namely, that it denied defendant’s motions to suppress and allowed into evidence certain physical evidence and statements allegedly procured in violation of his Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

The defendant made a timely motion to suppress the introduction of a T.V. channel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. PeacherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. BoltArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. CookArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. CarterArizona Supreme Court · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API