Legal Opinion

Morris v. Wilkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1955No. 102PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Defendant’s assignments of error present two questions: first, if the facts are as set forth in said affidavit, was the defendant entitled to file answer without first filing a defense bond in conformity with G.S. 1-111; and second, if so, did the court err in striking the answer and granting plaintiff’s motion for judgment by default final without finding the essential facts relating to the matters set forth in said affidavit, in the absence of specific request that the court make such findings ? Upon the record presented, these questions must be answered in the affirmative.

Ordinarily, a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Holcomb v. . HolcombSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Credle v. . AyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Vick v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CornellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Merrell v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Rich v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Pruitt v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API