Legal Opinion

Sledd v. Munsell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 28, 1939No. 34,066PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*111The opinion of the court was delivered by

AlleN, J.:

This was an action to cancel, a mineral conveyance and to quiet title. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals.

In plaintiff’s petition it is alleged that the defendant-Munsell' is a broker engaged in the business of buying and selling oil-and-gas leases, and oil, gas and other minerals; that he is familiar with the value of oil-and-gas leases and of mineral properties in Rice county; that plaintiff is the owner of a small farm in that county which was occupied by him as a home; that plaintiff is past eighty years of age, and is subject…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richards v. ShearerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Shaffer v. Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Serena v. RubinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Hoover v. Estate of HooverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Nealey v. Wyandotte Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fry v. DeweesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Dryden v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Magnusson v. Colorado Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Mingenback v. MingenbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API