Legal Opinion
Shibley v. Time, Inc.
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
Decided May 14, 1974No. 915,246PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFink, J.
This action comes before the court on defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint of the plaintiff and the cross-claim of the intervenor on the ground that they have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The plaintiff’s amended complaint and the intervenor’s cross-claim, the material allegations of which are deemed to be true for purposes of ruling on the defendants ’ motions *52for dismissal, in essence make the following claim: Plaintiff and members of the class which he represents have subscribed to publications or credit card privileges of defendants, and that said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Buford v. American Finance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- Gerlach v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
- Lamont v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Fay Young and Forrest Young v. That Was the Week That Was A/K/A Tw-3Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,173 Michael Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., Ann Flamm and Arnold Flamm v. Rudolph Eberstadt, Jr. And Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Mr. & Mrs. Jack N. Turoff, and Mr. & Mrs. Robert S. Turoff, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. The May CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Shibley v. Time, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Bosley v. WildWett. ComDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Lambert v. GarloOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.