Legal Opinion

Lamont v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 22, 1967No. 67 Civ. 1540PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKEL, District Judge.

Suing for himself “and all other owners of motor vehicles duly registered” in New York, plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief based upon the asserted unconstitutionality of N.Y. Vehicle and Traffic Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 71, § 202(3), which provides that the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

“may, in his discretion, contract with the highest responsible bidder to furnish copies of records of all vehicle registrations for any registration periiod, or number of periods not exceeding five years in the aggregate, with respect to a given territory.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Martin McNally v. The Pulitzer Publishing Company and Ted GestCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API