Legal Opinion
Mr. & Mrs. Jack N. Turoff, and Mr. & Mrs. Robert S. Turoff, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. The May Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1976No. 75--1697PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Per curiam
The Turoffs appeal from the final judgment in favor of The May Company (May), granted upon motion for summary judgment.
Issues
Was the district court correct in concluding that: (1) the Turoffs did not have standing to represent the class of May charge account customers similarly situated; (2) use of the “previous balance” ** billing method does not violate the Ohio Usury Law, O.R.C. 1343.01, the Uniform Commercial Code sections O.R.C. 1302.60, 1302.61, and 1302.85, the Ohio Retail Installment Sales Act, O.R.C. 1317.01 et seq., the Truth in Lending Act 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq., or the Board of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graybeal v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Cotchett v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Shields v. Valley National BankDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1971
- Shields v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1972
- Kriger v. European Health SPA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Paul Bender, George and Diane Decarlo v. Southland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,173 Michael Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., Ann Flamm and Arnold Flamm v. Rudolph Eberstadt, Jr. And Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Elizabeth Greisz v. Household Bank (Illinois), N.A., and Golden Seal Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Kent Eubank v. Pella CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- In Re the Cadillac V8-6-4 Class ActionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.