Legal Opinion
Shibley v. Time, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 19, 1975No. 33745 and 33748PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
Plaintiff, Norman W. Shibley, and intervenor, Joseph Kalk, have both filed appeals from the trial court’s granting of all defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint and crossclaim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. They also appeal a finding by the trial court that this action may not be maintained as a class action. The ruling appealed from is reported as Shibley v. Time (1974), 40 Ohio Misc. 51. The appeals of plaintiff and intervenor have been consolidated by this court.
This action originated with the plaintiff’s complaint against the publishers of Time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lamont v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Woelfling v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Shibley v. Time, Inc.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1974
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tobin v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Dwyer v. American Express Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Boyd v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Pennant Moldings, Inc. v. C & J Trucking Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Williams v. Jerry L. Kaltenbach Ent., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.