Legal Opinion
United States v. Hardeman
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 25, 1999No. 98-50025PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
GADOLA, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendant Walter Wimb Hardeman’s motion to suppress evidence filed on October 26, 1998. The government filed its answer and brief in response on November 9, 1998. Defendant has not filed a reply brief. Defendant seeks to exclude statements, the shotgun, handguns and ammunition found by officers of the Flint Police Department after their entry into defendant’s residence absent a warrant. The government has conceded that it will not seek to introduce any evidence…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Leslie Delynn ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- People v. FrohriepMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.