Scott v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
Before us, for the first time, is the validity of a motel room search pursuant to a police technique called “knock and talk” — a technique that, in recent years, has become quite popular with police agencies around the country. The courts, on the whole, have sustained it. Petitioner, Aaron Scott, who, as a direct result of such a search, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and, as a repeat offender, sentenced to a prison term of 10 years without parole, raises two questions:
*124(1) Does a “knock and talk” procedure…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Swift v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.