Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 11, 2001No. 143, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

Before us, for the first time, is the validity of a motel room search pursuant to a police technique called “knock and talk” — a technique that, in recent years, has become quite popular with police agencies around the country. The courts, on the whole, have sustained it. Petitioner, Aaron Scott, who, as a direct result of such a search, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and, as a repeat offender, sentenced to a prison term of 10 years without parole, raises two questions:

*124(1) Does a “knock and talk” procedure…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  5. Swift v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API