People v. Frohriep
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, J.
After a bench trial, the trial court convicted defendant of possession with intent to deliver marijuana, MCL 333.7401(2)(d)(iii), and sentenced him to serve six months in jail. On appeal as of right, defendant challenges the constitutionality of the police technique and of the search that yielded the evidence used to convict him. Defendant argues that the “knock and talk” procedure that the police employed is unconstitutional, and even if it is not, the search was unreasonable because defendant did not give consent. We affirm.
Before trial, the trial court heard defendant’s motion to suppress…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- People v. RobertsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. MahdiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- People of Michigan v. Glorianna WoodardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Gompf v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.