Legal Opinion

Webster v. Horton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1934No. 4-3297PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The decree of February 27,1932, became conclusive and binding upon all parties thereto at the expiration of-six months after its rendition, no appeal having been prosecuted therefrom. Section 2140, Crawford & Moses’ Digest. Stephens v. Williams, 122 Ark. 255, 183 S. W. 527; Newall v. Valley Farming Company, 133 Ark. 456, 202 S. W. 838. Therefore all asserted claims and rights of the Websters are precluded thereby.

The rights of appellant, Curtis K. McAdams, under and by virtue of his intervention were expressly reserved by the court for future…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Napoleon Hill Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Rankin v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  3. Frazier v. FrazierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Kruegel v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Newald v. Valley Farming Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baier v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Washington Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. HammettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. Baker v. LeighSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Meckler v. WeissSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Jeffery, County Judge v. TrevathanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API