Legal Opinion

Kruegel v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

This appeal is from an order overruling a motion made under article 1687, R. S. 1911, to appoint a clerk pro tem-pore in a suit brought by appellant in a district court of Dallas county. In his motion appellant alleged that H. H. Williams, the clerk of said court, was a party to the suit, and therefore that it was necessary, before he could procure the issuance of lawful process for service on said Williams and other defendants in the suit, that a clerk pro tem-pore should be appointed.

Appellant’s petition in the suit commenced by him is not a part of the record sent to this court. In no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Shackleford v. McElhinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Powdrill v. PowdrillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Texas Rubber Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Texas Co. v. HonakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Texas Wheat Growers' Ass'n v. GoughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Webster v. HortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. German v. Houston T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API