Legal Opinion
Christy v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 9, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 93-CV-3346PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
By way of the motions presently before the Court, the defendants in this civil action seek the entry of summary judgment in their favor on all counts of the plaintiffs complaint against them. For the reasons set forth in the following paragraphs, the motions are denied.
I. STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS
On June 22, 1993, the plaintiff, Charles Christy, commenced this case against the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and its individual commissioners and personnel committee members pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and for the common law tort of…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Christy v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995