Legal Opinion

Arnold v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 13, 1913No. 2525PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by John H. Arnold and others against the City of Tulsa and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

From a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county rendered and entered March 25, 1911, sustaining a demurrer to their petition interposed by the defendants city of Tulsa and others and the intervenor, the Eureka Cqnstruction Company, and dissolving their temporary restraining order enjoining the city from collecting a special assessment sought to be imposed on certain lots belonging to them in said city, plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, bring the case here. They assign that the court erred in sustaining said demurrer. Plaintiffs, after alleging the corporate existence of the city…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Mason v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Emmerson v. BotkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Wahlgren v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. City of Topeka v. GageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Lusk v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Southern Surety Co. v. JaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API