Legal Opinion
Bleday v. Oum Group
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 11, 1994No. 1856PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
Raymond M. Bleday, DPM, and Central Pennsylvania Podiatry Associates (Appellants) appeal from the order entered by the trial court sustaining the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer of OUM Group, Pacific Insurance, Continental Insurance, Continental Insurance Health Care (Insurers) and of Riley & Fleming Adjusters, Ltd. (Adjusters). We affirm.
Appellants secured malpractice insurance through Insurers for the period of February, 1988, through February, 1989. The policy obtained by Appellants contained the following premium:
The company shall have the right and duty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hudock v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Feliberty v. DamonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Shuster v. South Broward Hosp. Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Mitchum v. HudgensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Marginian v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Step Plan Services, Inc. v. KoreskoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Maia Caplan, in 95-1445 v. Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & Kaskey David L. Braverman. Maia Caplan v. Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & Kaskey David L. Braverman, Vigilant Insurance Company, in 95-1478Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Dennis Haugh v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.