Legal Opinion

Marginian v. Allstate Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1985No. Nos. 84-686 and 84-687PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The novel issue presented in the causes before us is whether an insured has a cause of action against its insurer when, contrary to the wishes of the insured, the insurer settles claims lodged against the insured within the monetary limits of the insured’s policy, and where the policy empowers the insurer to settle claims as it feels appropriate.

The insurance policy issued by appellant to appellee provides in relevant part:

“Allstate will pay for all damages a person insured is legally obligated to pay — because of bodily injury or property damage * * *:
“We will defend a person insured if sued…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Olmstead v. Lumbermens Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Motorists Mutual Ins. Co. v. TomanskiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Centennial Insurance v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Stickel v. Excess Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Maia Caplan, in 95-1445 v. Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & Kaskey David L. Braverman. Maia Caplan v. Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & Kaskey David L. Braverman, Vigilant Insurance Company, in 95-1478Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Caplan v. Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & KaskeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Shuster v. South Broward Hosp. Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Cash v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API