Legal Opinion
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Fronk
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided November 10, 1906No. 14,547PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error from Stafford district court; Jermain W. Brinckerhoff, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*520The opinion of the court was delivered by
Greene, J.:
This action was commenced by C. A. Fronk, as administrator of the estate of Elmer Tindall, deceased, to recover damages for the death of Tindall, alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the servants and employees of the defendant, the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company.
It was alleged in the petition that at the time Elmer Tindall received the injuries from which he died he was in the service of the defendant as a student brakeman on a freight-train; and that through the negligence of the agents, servants and employees…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Weisser v. Southern Pacific Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. IvyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Short v. Bullion-Beck & Champion Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
- Huntzicker v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
3Cited by13 opinions
- Terry Neustrom v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. OlveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Rief v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Western Furniture & Manufacturing Co. v. BloomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.