Legal Opinion
Huntzicker v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1904No. 1,267PublishedCited by 12 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee.
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff’s intestate, Fred Fereday, a young man desiring employment in the train service of the defendant, applied to the trainmaster on one of its divisions therefor, and, it appearing that he had not had sufficient experience to qualify him for the service, it was agreed that he should go upon the road and learn by observation and practice what the duties of a flagman were, and gain the necessary experience to qualify him. To this end the trainmaster gave him the following permit:
' “Fulton, Ky., May 14, 1902.
“Freight Conductors, Fulton District:
“Allow the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New England Railroad v. ConroySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Oakes v. MaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Mason v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1848
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Southern Pac. Co. v. LibbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FronkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Rief v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Dayton Coal & Iron Co. v. DoddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.