Legal Opinion

People v. Rowe

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 2014No. D063847PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*313Opinion

McConnell, P. J.

INTRODUCTION

In this case, we must decide whether a magistrate erred in determining a defendant should not have to answer charges of soliciting forcible rape and forcible sodomy after defendant advertised online for sexual partners for an unwitting victim and then, while impersonating the victim, invited men who responded to the advertisement to appear at the victim’s home unannounced to engage in “freak show” sexual activity. We conclude the magistrate indeed erred and, therefore, reverse the superior court’s order denying the People’s motion to reinstate the charges.

BAC…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. BeltranCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. ShockleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. PedrozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. Super. Ct. (Valenzuela)California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API