Legal Opinion

Bove v. Beckman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1965No. Civ. 27853PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. *

Daniel Bove brought this action for wrongful death of his wife Maureen. At pretrial it appeared that Mr. and Mrs. Carlson were surviving parents of decedent and the court ordered that they be added as plaintiffs. Judgment was rendered after a nonjury trial in favor of the three plaintiffs in the sum of $9,937.45 against Ronald Lee Beckman, the driver of the automobile which struck and killed Mrs. Bove, and against the owner Earl Beckman in the sum of $5,000. Defendants have appealed.

In this court their counsel rely principally upon the argument that decedent was contributorily…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Gigliotti v. NunesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lacy v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Gardner v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Barkus v. White CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Duncan v. Duncan Kitchen Grips, Inc. CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Gardner v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API