Legal Opinion

Gardner v. City of San Jose

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1967No. Civ. 22442PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVINE, J.*

The City of San Jose appeals from judgment upon a verdict in amount $90,000. The amount would have been $100,000 but the jury was instructed that if the verdict were for plaintiff, they should deduct $10,000 which had been paid by the insurance carrier for another defendant, Joanne Mitchell, the full amount of Mrs. Mitchell’s policy. Mrs. Mitchell was the driver of an automobile which struck plaintiff, Sharon Gardner, while she was crossing Naglee Avenue in a crosswalk. Plaintiff’s action against the city is grounded on asserted dangerous condition of public property.

Plaintiff, a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Raymond v. Paradise Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Brown v. ReganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Harris v. JoffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. P.H.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Harland v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. White v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Bakity v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API