Boots v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION & ORDER
THOMAS J. McAYOY, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs Peter and Cindy Boots (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this products liability action, alleging that a defective utility knife manufactured by Defendant Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (“Defendant”) injured Plaintiff Peter Boots. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment, which is presently before the Court.
I. BACKGROUND
This case concerns Plaintiffs’ claim that Peter Boots was injured by a defective utility knife sold by the Defendant. As part of its motion for summary judgment, Defendant’s brief contained a statement of material…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vicuna v. O.P. Schuman & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company as subrogee of Scott and L K Kilgore v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2020