Legal Opinion

Boots v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided September 16, 2015No. 8:13cv1096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION & ORDER

THOMAS J. McAYOY, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs Peter and Cindy Boots (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this products liability action, alleging that a defective utility knife manufactured by Defendant Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (“Defendant”) injured Plaintiff Peter Boots. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment, which is presently before the Court.

I. BACKGROUND

This case concerns Plaintiffs’ claim that Peter Boots was injured by a defective utility knife sold by the Defendant. As part of its motion for summary judgment, Defendant’s brief contained a statement of material…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vicuna v. O.P. Schuman & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  2. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company as subrogee of Scott and L K Kilgore v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API