Stone v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers (Abstract 39257).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vuies, Judge
The merchandise is described by the appraiser as currants, crushed or broken. A member of the importing firm, testifying before the board, stated that the merchandise was made from currants by grinding in a mill like a coffee mill. Undoubtedly, though not apparently, the importation is a material made 'from currants reduced to a pulp for the use of making wine. The Board of General Appraisers deemed a previous decision by them as cbntrolling. The decision referred to was Abstract 16814 (T. D. 28429), affirmed by consent by the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- McLean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Shing Shun & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nootka Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Andrews & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Dutch Cheese Importers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Emery v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.