Legal Opinion

Emery v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 27, 1945No. C. D. 934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

These are suits against the United States brought to recover certain customs duties alleged to have been improperly exacted on merchandise consisting of alfalfa hay. The cases were submitted on a stipulation reading in part as follows:

That the sample marked K-893 is representative of the merchandise covered by entry Nos. K-580, K-637, K-660, K-727, K-849, K-893, K-925, and K-953 ■in Protest 58920-K, and entry No. K-1023 in Protest 60739-K, and that the same may be received in evidence and marked plaintiff’s exhibit 1.

That the sample marked K-1160 is representative of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API